Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
Judge: City biased vs. white males
By Susan Greene
Denver Post Staff Writer
March 8 - Denver systematically has
discriminated against white male contractors under the city's
10-year-old affirmative-action policy, a federal judge ruled
Tuesday.
The decision is a blow for Mayor Wellington Webb, whose
administration has spent eight years and nearly $2 million in tax
dollars defending its ordinances promoting minority- and
female-owned businesses.
"This is near and dear to the administration," said Scott
Detamore, the lawyer for the plaintiffs, Concrete Works of Colorado
Inc. "I would imagine that, while a brave face is being put on it,
this is a very serious, a very personal loss."
Webb, a fervent supporter of affirmative action, said in a
prepared statement that he is "disappointed" by the ruling but
didn't indicate whether he'll appeal it.
He added that the decision may have a "chilling effect" on
qualified female- and minority-owned firms competing to construct a
new city office building, renovate the Denver Zoo, and expand the
Colorado Convention Center and the Denver Art Museum.
"This is a sad day for equal opportunity," Webb said.
U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch ordered the city to
immediately stop enforcing its law - meaning it no longer can
require general contractors to consider race or gender in awarding
subcontracts.
The Brighton-based Concrete Works sued Denver in 1992 over
ordinances calling for general contractors hired by the city to make
"good-faith" efforts to complete at least 16 percent of their
subcontracting work using minority-owned businesses, and at least 12
percent using female-owned firms. Webb's aides said those standards
- which were lowered to 10 percent in both categories in 1998 - were
flexible goals, not quotas, intended to remedy perceived race and
gender bias in construction.
Company president Marc Lenert claimed the requirements caused him
to lose four city construction contracts, even though he was the
lowest bidder. Lenert said the policy gave minorities and women
unfair advantages over their white male competitors and denied his
company equal protection under the 14th Amendment. Further, he
argued, it's not the city's role to correct discrimination in the
construction industry or in society.
"I like to choose a contractor on the quality of his work, not
the color of his skin," Lenert said. "We shouldn't have to play the
games that Denver says we should play."
The case meandered through the courts for eight years until it
reached Matsch. He heard the case for three weeks last year and
issued his 79-page opinion Tuesday morning.
He ruled that the city couldn't prove a pattern of discrimination
in the contracting industry and therefore couldn't justify its
policy. Further, he blasted the city's evidence about discrimination
- studies for which it paid top dollar.
"The methodology was not designed to answer the relevant
questions, the collection of data was flawed, important variables
were not accounted for in the analyses and the conclusions were
based on unreasonable assumptions," he wrote. "Taken altogether, the
city has failed to make the strong showing necessary to support the
race- and gender-based allocation of business opportunities mandated
by these three ordinances." His decision comes as judges nationwide
are cracking down on similar affirmative-action policies.
Courts have shot down ordinances in Philadelphia, Miami's Dade
County, Columbus, Baltimore, Florida and Minnesota.
Greg Eurich, a Holland & Hart attorney specializing in
affirmative-action cases, said Tuesday's ruling came "as little
surprise."
"Plans that try to solve society's historical discrimination are
difficult to sustain," he said.
Eurich and other legal experts expect Matsch's decision to set a
legal precedent for cities throughout Colorado, but they note that
Denver had the state's most aggressive affirmative-action policy.
Nationwide, Detamore added, the ruling will "reaffirm precedent
that's already been established."
"The Constitution was vindicated," he added.
Detamore works for the Rocky Mountain States Legal Foundation, a
conservative legal group that successfully represented a Colorado
Springs businessman before the U.S. Supreme Court in his 1995
reverse-discrimination suit against that city.
He tried the Denver case with part-time help from another
attorney. The city had six lawyers in trial, plus more attorneys
working behind the scenes. The city also hired a battalion of
high-priced consultants and expert witnesses who charged up to $350
an hour.
One consultant, Richard Doby, charged the city $14.58 each time
he left a phone message regarding the case, city records show.
Detamore aims to recover "hundreds of thousands of dollars" in
legal fees, plus at least $200,000 in other costs.
Two city council members expressed concern Tuesday that Webb
might add to the city's costs by appealing Matsch's decision.
"It's a major waste of city funds," said Councilman Ted
Hackworth, chairman of the finance committee.
"The case was a loser four years ago, it's a loser today and
it'll keep on being a loser," said Councilman Ed Thomas, who called
on Webb to "retool our contracting policies so they're fair for
everyone."
Political experts said Matsch's ruling will sting Webb
politically, especially because he has made affirmative action a
centerpiece of his nine-year administration.
"Basically, the judge has said the mayor's main issue is illegal
and misguided," said Denver political consultant Eric Sondermann.
"His harsh language calls into question the city's rationale and
even their good faith."
Dads Against the Divorce Industry