Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
|
Collision with a pathetic reality
By Dr. Wade F. Horn
JUST WHEN I THINK it
can't get any worse, it does.
During a recent morning commute from the suburbs of Virginia into
Washington, D.C., a van flipped over leaving one of its passengers
lying in the middle of the highway, half-conscious, spitting blood
and convulsing. Two motorists, a 31 year-old Pentagon computer
specialist and a 38 year-old army major, stopped to give assistance.
That's the good news. Now for the bad.
As these two Good Samaritans were administering first aide to the
victim, other morningrush hour commuters, many in BMWs, paused just
long enough to shout such "helpful" comments as: "Why don't you
learn how to drive!" and "Get out of the road!" Some drivers refused
to slow down or even move over to another lane. Several cars came
within inches of running over the victim. A taxi cab driver hailed
down by one of the rescuers, refused to call 911 for assistance. As
one cop said at the scene of the accident, "This world has just got
about as cold as it can get."
As Simon, the black tow-truck driver in the movie Grand Canyon
said, when faced with five young thugs about to mug and maybe even
kill a lost motorist: "Man, the world ain't s'pposed to work like
this ... This ain't the way it's s'pposed to be."
He's right. The world ain't s'pposed to be this way.
Research by developmental psychologists shows that for the vast
majority of us, concern for others emerges very early in life. Even
before children are a year old, the cries of another child elicits a
frown, crying or imploring looks toward adults to take care of the
distressed child. By the time children reach two years of age, most
try to do something for a distressed child, such as protecting them,
bringing help, making suggestions or verbally expressing sympathy.
In one study of three- to seven-year-olds on playgrounds, about
half of all children showed visible concerns when another child was
crying, with 32 percent either coming to the youngster's aid, asking
an adult to help or threatening the child who was responsible for
the tears. Only 2 percent showed a complete lack of empathy. So, if
empathy and giving aid emerges so early and is so common in young
children, why was it so uncommon in the D.C. commuters on that
Tuesday morning?
One answer is television. The daily stream of violent and
distressed images emanating from our TVs serves to desensitize us --
and our children -- to the reality of suffering as well as to the
needs of others. Yet another reason to turn that TV off.
Another answer is the lack of compassionate and giving models for
our children to emulate.
Most of us preach a good talk about caring for others, but when
it comes to the doing, many of us fall short. It is useful to remind
ourselves that when it comes to rasing compassionate kids, the best
sermon is, indeed, a good example.
But I think a far more important reason is our turning away from
universal truths in favor of embracing a value-free culture. In our
admirable desire to be inclusive and to respect diversity, we far
too easily discard the idea that there are, nonetheless, universal
truths and moral standards to which we all should adhere. Recently,
for example, I read a report on the enforcement of statutory rape
laws which argued that sex between twenty-year-old men and 14- and
15-year-old girls is not always a problem because in some cultures
this kind of thing is acceptable. This is, in plain language,
cultural relativism run amok.
Absent an understanding that there are universal truths -- that
some things are absolutely right, others absolutely wrong -- we
float aimlessly through life with no clear moral compass to guide
us. Without an overarching metaphysical basis for ethical
decisionmaking, all that is left is the wimpy admonition to
"practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty."
But what that bleeding woman needed on that highway was not a
random act of kindness, but commuters who understood that it is
simply unacceptable to speed by someone in distress.
What she needed was not a senseless act of beauty, but a culture
with sense enough to "do unto others as you would have them do unto
you."
This is where parents come in. Compassion for others may emerge
early in childhood. But left alone, it will whither. It is up to us
as parents to ensure that these early emerging signs of caring and
altruism are nurtured and reinforced.
Doing so requires that we first model compassion and caring for
others in our own lives.
Not just with our children, but with our neighbors. Giving checks
to charity is nice, but its influence on our children is far less
than when they observe us giving of ourselves.
Second, we need to help our children develop the skills for
translating compassion and concern for others into concrete action.
Research shows that children do not behave affectionately,
considerately and cooperatively with others merely because they
observe pro-social models. Rather, we must encourage them to engage
in these behaviors, for virtuous behavior becomes a habit only
through practice.
Finally, and most importantly, we need to teach our children that
they are not some random, cosmic accident, floating about in an
indifferent and empty universe, but unique creations of G-d, who
provides us with a higher purpose for living than mere momentary
pleasure. If we fail in this, don't be surprised that all we have
left is a world in which busy commuters speed by accident scenes in
their |
Dads Against the Divorce Industry