Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
Time With Children Is Investment in Future
By Dr. Wade F. Horn
http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
Q: Is it just my
imagination, or are parents spending less time with their kids these
days?
A: It's not your imagination. Parents today spend roughly 40
percent less time with their children than did parents a generation
ago. According to one survey, in 1965, parents spent on average
about 30 hours per week with their kids. By 1985, parent-child
interaction had dropped to just 17 hours per week.
Another study found that almost 20 percent of children in grades
six through 12 had not had a good conversation lasting for at least
10 minutes with at least one of their parents in more than a month.
A poll for the National Parenting Association found that 36% of
parents do not give any time to their kids' extracurricular
activities.
There are a number of reasons for this decrease in parent-child
time. One of the biggest factors is the dramatic increase in the
number of single parent households. Studies consistently find that
children whose parents separate or divorce have less parental
involvement and are monitored less closely than peers whose parents
remain married.
Indeed, single mothers, on average, spend roughly one-third less
time each week than married mothers in primary child care activities
such as dressing, feeding, chauffeuring, talking, playing or helping
with homework.
This, of course, is not very surprising. When there are two
parents in the home, it is possible for one parent to be helping
little Johnny with his homework or reading little Janey a bedtime
story while the other is doing the dishes. With only one parent in
the home, time spent doing non-interactive household chores is time
not available to be spent interacting with the kids.
A second reason for the decline in family time is the increase in
two-earner households. In the days of Ozzie and Harriet (i.e., when
I was growing up), many two-parent families only had one adult in
the paid labor force. The other stayed home and did such things as
making breakfast for the children, helping them with their homework
after school, and volunteering in their child's classroom.
The combination of high taxes and today's consumer culture has
led many families to believe that it is necessary to send both
parents into the paid labor force. When both parents are working
outside the home, they are often too exhausted after a long day at
the office to do anything but necessary household chores.
As a result, too many parents believe they can substitute "stuff"
for time with the kids. Indeed, a recent phone survey of over 3,200
adults and children found that over half of the adults surveyed say
it is common for parents to equate buying things for their children
to caring for them.
The biggest thief of family time, however, is something we have
been inviting into our homes with increasing frequency over the past
fifty years: television. One study found that children between the
ages of 6 and 11 watch an average of 23 hours of television per week
and teenagers watch an average of 21 hours of television per week.
In contrast, teenagers spend only 35 minutes per week talking with
their fathers.
The real question is: Does any of this matter?
Some counsel that decreasing family time is not something about
which we ought to be very concerned. So long as the time we do give
our kids is of sufficient "quality," some argue, we don't have to
worry all that much about "quantity."
Sounds good, doesn't it? Just grab a few minutes here or there of
good old "quality time" and the kids will be alright. And besides,
it's peers that really matter, not parents, right?
Well, wrong. Research consistently shows that the most important
protector against children developing serious problems is the
quality of the relationship they have with their parents. A recent
national study involving over 100,000 adolescents, for example,
found that the most important factor associated with the avoidance
of such high risk behaviors as alcohol and illicit drug use,
smoking, violence, and sexual activity was -- you guessed it --
connectedness with one's parents.
And just how do children develop "connectedness" with their
parents? It takes time. Why? Because when we give time to our
children, we communicate in the clearest way possible that we care
about them. Kids, it seems, spell "love" T-I-M-E.
But shouldn't the time we spend with our kids be of high quality?
Of course. But time is like oxygen. The quality of the oxygen that
we breath matters, but so does the quantity. Brief sips of high
quality oxygen here or there won't keep you alive for very long. And
neither will large quantities of polluted oxygen. What we need is
both.
And so it is with children. The truth is children are not light
switches. When it comes to time, quantity is important precisely
because it is our children, and not us, who determine whether or not
a particular moment will prove to be important. When that moment
comes, you don't want to miss it; no matter how entertaining the
latest TV sitcom might seem to be. It is just not
possible to have the television on for three to four hours per day
and expect to have time for any meaningful interaction with the
kids. Unfortunately, when faced with the choice of TV or time with
the kids, too often parents choose TV.
Back to DA*DI's
Home
Dads Against the Divorce Industry