Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
"Narcissus"
...
But I have reached
my destination and,
kneeling at water's
edge, look and see
myself framed by
everything that goes
on - endlessly
beginning all around
ME.
~~~~~~~~
By Robert Cording
The Children's Side Of Divorce: Some Surprising Conclusions
By MARY JO KOCHAKIAN
The Hartford Courant
September 04, 2000
People think there
are two sides to a divorce - his and hers, writes researcher Judith
Wallerstein.
The most shocking version of the story comes from outsiders,
though: the children.
Page after page of the new, anticipated book "The Unexpected
Legacy of Divorce'' reveals that adults have no idea what divorce is
to children.
For this report, Wallerstein interviewed people from 131 families
whom she first met in the 1970s as little kids in Marin County,
Calif., whose parents divorced. Wallerstein began a long-term study
of the effects of divorce in 1971.
Now these people have stories to tell, and what they say rages
against conventional wisdom.
"The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce'' by Wallerstein, Julia M.
Lewis and Sandra Blakeslee (Hyperion, $24.95) tells us that:
For children who are not yet adolescents, "which means most
children of divorce, since demographers tell us that 80 percent of
divorces occur by the ninth year of marriage - splitting the family
to solve family problems makes no sense of at all. Few children are
aware that their parents are suffering. Even if they have seen one
or both of their parents crying or yelling or hitting, they do not
make the connection between the parents' behavior and the breakup of
the marriage. ... such a connection is an abstract idea far beyond
their ability to understand,'' the authors write.
Yet parents expect kids will understand, and that they will
adjust. And why not? That's the standard line: So many kids have
divorced parents now that it's not a big deal; children are really
resilient; if the parents are miserable, the kids are going to be
miserable.
Instead, the authors find that while divorce often improves life
for at least one parent, it is at the cost of the children's
happiness.
We read of one misery after another. Among them:
Many of the children are angry at their fathers and report that
they are unlikely to help them in old age.
Wallerstein writes that she was horrified to find that children
whose parents divorced often were not provided with financial help
for a college education, even though it was within the family means.
The father, providing support until age 18, felt he had met his
obligation. And that was that.
("An intolerable injustice,'' Wallerstein writes. "The children
will never forgive their parents for this betrayal, nor should
they.'')
"It's in adulthood that children of divorce suffer the most. The
impact of divorce hits them most cruelly as they go in search of
love, sexual intimacy and commitment. Their lack of inner images of
a man and a woman in a stable relationship and their memories of
their parents' failure to sustain the marriage badly hobbles their
search, leading them to heartbreak and even despair.''
Some of her subjects manage to get it right, after long
struggles.
"Larry,'' who as a teenager attacked his mother, eventually
realizes his abusive father is a creep - and works like a dog to not
be like the old man.
"Karen,'' who as a girl was caretaker to her mother and siblings,
decides she's done enough, furthers her career and cannot really
believe it when she ends up with a kind husband and a baby girl. If
there is a quarrel, she panics that her husband will abandon her.
Certainly there is a lot of marital misery among couples who
decide to stick it out. Are their kids any better off than the kids
whose parents split up?
For her 25-year follow-up, Wallerstein interviewed a comparison
group of adults - people who grew up alongside the children in her
study but whose parents stayed together.
Children from the somewhat unhappy marriages had escape hatches.
They could spend their time with friends, in school activities or
playing sports.
Kids in joint-custody arrangements often didn't have that
freedom.
If the parents kept the marriage afloat, the kids had a support
system. The children were fed regularly, they were looked after and
were able to spend time with their parents.
Children whose parents divorced often were lonely, left to care
for themselves and suffered a drastic loss in nurturing when mothers
became overwhelmed single parents.
Children whose parents stayed together at least had some idea of
what marriage requires - work, commitment, patience. They also
viewed their parents as a couple.
This is precisely what made young adulthood so tough for people
whose parents divorced. They lacked that example.
The conclusion: Even if their parents' marriages were pretty
unhappy, those kids did better - as long as parents continued to
take care of them.
The book has an answer to the question that dogs so many people:
Should I get divorced?
"This finding speaks directly to parents who are thinking about
divorce. Are your children doing well despite your unhappiness?''
What a difference this is from the gotta-be-me ethos of the '70s.
Back to DA*DI's
Home
Dads Against the Divorce Industry