DUMB IS DANGEROUS
|
 |
|
We must compare our
students' basic knowledge with students from the past.
|
|
|
Thomas SowellThere has been a flurry of comments on the
incredibly low level of knowledge revealed by a recent test of
applicants for jobs as teachers in Massachusetts. However, what is
even more important than what these applicants lack intellectually
is how dangerous such people are in our classrooms.
Why are
dumb teachers dangerous? Because nature abhors a vacuum. If
teachers' minds are not filled with knowledge and understanding,
they will be filled with other things -- the kinds of things that
appeal to shallow minds.
That is why our schools are so full
of fads, psychobabble and amateurish attempts at social engineering.
Much of this stuff is just silly but much of it is also dangerous to
the students and to the whole society.
Take "trust-building"
exercises, for example. All too typical of this kind of activity
were a group of blindfolded teenagers that I saw in Yosemite,
holding on to one another and being led through the woods by an
adult, who was simply beaming at his own role in this activity.
There are many other varieties of trust-building activities indulged
in on school grounds or elsewhere.
The whole point of these
exercises is to create the impression that you can rely on your
peers. Along with this is a considerable educational literature
which creates the impression that young people cannot rely on their
parents, on traditional morality or on the norms of a disdained
"society."
There is probably no more dangerous period of
life than adolescence. All the dedicated efforts that have gone into
raising a child to that point and all the deepest hopes that these
efforts will pay off in future years can be destroyed overnight in
adolescence by an unwanted pregnancy, drugs or any of the many other
ill-advised adventures that adolescents have gotten into.
Yet
here are our taxpayer-supported schools teaching adolescents to rely
on similarly inexperienced teenagers around them for guidance and to
emancipate themselves from the knowledge and experience that their
parents and other adults have acquired -- often painfully -- before
them.
Shallow teachers, who are the least likely to grasp
the huge dangers in promoting such attitudes, are also the most
likely to be attracted to such non-academic novelties.
The
systematic undermining of morality that used to be called "values
clarification" is still going on in our public schools under other
labels, now that parents and critics have caught on to what "values
clarification" really means. It means reducing moral principles to
mere subjective feelings, as if there were no social or intellectual
processes through which experience tests notions against
realities.
The "non-judgmental" nature of much of the
classroom social engineering that goes on is consistent with this
emphasis on feelings, on diaries and on other devices that put
personal feelings on the same plane as tested knowledge and tested
moral principles that enable a society to function.
It is
hardly surprising that a steady diet of this kind of mush leads many
children to think that cheating is all right, as a recent survey
showed, or leads some children to think it is OK to start shooting
people they don't like, whether at school or at home, as tragic
events at schools around the country have shown.
However
surprising the Massachusetts test results may have been to some
people, what should be even more revealing is that this was the
first time such a test had been used to screen applicants for jobs
as teachers in that state. In other words, these incompetents would
have sailed right through in previous years and spent a lifetime in
Massachusetts classrooms, spreading their ignorance and confusion to
children.
In many other states, tests for teachers have
existed longer than in Massachusetts but often these tests are so
easy to pass that they are meaningless. The political clout of
teachers' unions ensures that these tests will remain
easy.
We hear a lot of talk about "artificial intelligence"
being created by computers but a far more important issue is
artificial stupidity being created and spread to students by
teachers who abandon academics in favor of glittering social
theories.
The neglect of hard knowledge and the failure to
develop intellectual qualities in students is just part of the high
price of allowing shallow people to set the norms in our public
schools. Dumbness is dangerous. And tenured dumbness is doubly
dangerous.
To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read
features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit
the Creators Syndicate web page at http://www.creators.com/.
COPYRIGHT
1998 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Back to Current
Affairs
| |