ADHD - Is Ritalin Kiddie Cocaine?
Ritalin - The Feminists’ Answer to Active Little Boys
By: Mary Mostert, Analyst, Original Source (www.originalsources.com)
September 2, 1999
A study published recently by the American Journal of Public Health
which involved 30,000 children in two school districts in Virginia
strongly suggestes that ADHD, the attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder, “may be overdiagnosed, and the drug used to treat the
condition may be overprescribed.”
Really now? Having raised a very active boy who quite definitely
would be on Ritalin today if his teachers had their way, I still doubt
the existence of the “disorder.” Today, nearly 6 percent of the
school-age population in the United States has been diagnosed with ADHD,
a condition “characterised by impulsive behaviour and difficulties in
paying attention and keeping still.” Approximately 90 percent of
patients with ADHD take the drug Ritalin.
Ritalin, or methylphenidate, is a mild central nervous system
stimulant. It boosts the brain's ability to control impulsive behaviour
and helps children concentrate. Dr. Mary Ann Block the author of "No
More Ritalin" refers to Ritalin as "kiddie cocaine" and contends it can
cause dangerous behaviour. (see: http://www.blockcenter.com/main.htm)
Among my grandchildren’s generation, Ritalin use, in my opinion, quite
definitely IS being used as “kiddie cocaine” to “control” normal boy
behavior.
Today, when a child is totally bored in school, or jumps from one
subject to another, you can bet someone at that school is going to
pressure the parents to put the kid of Ritalin. In fact, one of my
grandaughters, far less active and less rambunctious than her uncle at
the same age was teacher-diagnosed as needing Ritalin. Her mother’s
answer was a firm “No!”
LeFever found the number of children medicated in school for ADHD was
17 percent for white boys, 9 percent for African-American boys, 7
percent for white girls and 3 percent for African-American girls.
Seventeen percent of Virginia’s white boys are abnormal and require
what Dr. Block calls “... mind-altering drugs”? Block points out that
Ritalin, is “almost identical to cocaine -- goes to the same receptor
site in the brain, causes the same high when taken in the same manner,"
Block said. Of course, the doctors who prescribe Ritalin claim it is
“safe when taken under close supervision and does not have long-term
effects even if started at a very young age.”
Others see a totally different picture with the same “results.” What
many teachers want to see in their students, and what Ritalin does may
be the same thing. However, is what teachers want in the way of
behaviour in their class necessarily a good thing for a bright, healthy,
child with an inquiring mind? Is the problem in the classroom with the
child not paying attention or the problem in the classroom a boring
teacher?
For example, if your 10 year old son is considered ADHD in the
classroom because he won’t or “can’t” concentrate, but comes home and
plays for hours with his game-boy or Nintendo, the kid obviously CAN
concentrate. In fact, most 10 year olds today can beat the socks off
their grandparents at Nintendo because they are so GOOD at concentrating
on the game.
Invariably when I get into a discussion with ADHD parents they tell
me that their child usually “performs better in school” and “relates
better with family and friends.” When I ask for specifics I find that
the child is “better able” to do boring school work. This is a plus?
Parents, some of the homework I’ve seen in recent years makes no sense.
A child who can plow through it and end up believing it makes sense is
the one with the problem, not the child who is bored with it.
In November 1998, Dr. Peter R. Breggin presented a scientific paper
at the Plenary Session of the National Institute of Health Consensus
Conference on ADHD and its Treatment. (see:
http://www.breggin.com/ritalin.html) He dealt with the common dosage of
Ritalin for young children saying, in part: “There is little doubt that
stimulants can, for a time at least, subdue a child's behaviour, making
the child easier to manage and especially more willing to perform rote,
boring tasks. But we need to look beneath the surface at the underlying
effects and mechanisms of action.”
Dr. Breggin’s warnings need to be known to every parent who gives
their child Ritalin:
1. Psychostimulants (such as Ritalin) can cause irreversible brain
damage and dysfunction. This is known with high degree of scientific
probability in regard to amphetamine and methamphetamine, and with a
high suspicion in regard to methylphenidate.
2. Psychostimulants cause multiple adverse effects, including a
variety of cardiac and central nervous system effects, such as COD,
depression, and even mania. The CNS effects often confuse doctors,
leading inappropriately to further psychiatric diagnosis and medication
rather than to drug withdrawal.
3. Psychostimulants impair growth--including the brain.
4. Psychostimulants work by suppressing spontaneity and sociability,
by enforcing obsessive-compulsive preservative behaviour, and by
isolating the child from normal outside influences.
A chart that accompanied Breggin’s paper listed adverse drug
reactions, some of which were considered “improvements in behaviour”
by parents and teachers! He listed the following adverse drug
reactions (ADRs): Social withdrawal and isolation; General dampening of
social behaviour; Reduced social interactions, talking, or sociability;
Decreased responsiveness to parents and other children; Increased
solitary play; Diminished play.
Other adverse affects of Ritalin included: Obsessive-compulsive
behaviour, Preservative behaviour; Cognitive preservation; Inflexibility
of thinking; Over-focusing or excessive focusing; Compliance, especially
in structured environments; Reduced curiosity; Somber; Subdued
Apathetic; lethargic: "tired, withdrawn, listless, depressed, dopey,
dazed, subdued and inactive" --passive and submissive behaviours.
Why are these adverse affects considered “improvements” in the
child’s (usually a boy’s) behaviour? Why do we want the men of America
to be less curious, lethargic, subdued, inactive, passive and
submissive? Because we are living in a militantly feminist culture which
condemns anything masculine - but especially active, curious, hard to
brainwash or manage males, that’s why. Any bright, energetic, boy who
challenges today’s politically correct feminist notions is very apt to
find himself drugged into submission, especially if he’s living with a
feminist single mother.
Often when there’s a father in the house, he will squash the drug
approach to behavior which he probably well remembers doing himself at
the same age. Someone should study the ritalin use of boys being raised
by a single mother. I suspect they’d find a far higher use of mind
altering drugs on boys being raised without their fathers.
The very characteristics that working parents and controlling
teachers see as “problems” in growing boys are often the same as the
characteristics of success - the ability to move quickly from one idea
or problem to another, sociability, curiosity, friendliness - once the
boy is grown. It sometimes takes patience and humour to see a sociable,
curious, friendly, boy with many different interests and ideas through
to adulthood, but the rewards are great.
Without those characteristics I don’t see how my son Guy, who today
is an orthopedic surgeon, could ever have had the determination to get
through 2 years as a full-time missionary, 4 years of college, 4 years
of medical school, three years as a Navy doctor, (who served in Desert
Storm) and four years as an orthopedic surgery resident. If I’d given
him Ritalin, he would have simply remained a framing carpenter. Now,
there’s nothing wrong with framing carpenters. He worked his way through
college as a carpenter. But, there were other things he was curious
about and wanted to learn and some teachers really got upset with that.
They could not comprehend why Guy was reading in the encyclopedia about
elephants when they had explicitly ordered him to look up owls. They
never understood that he looked up owls, and found they ate mice and
that got him curious about mice and what they eat so he looked up mice
and then remembered that elephants were supposed to be afraid of mice so
he was looking up elephants to see if that was really true. Some
teachers just wanted him OUT of their class.
Today his “lack of concentration” on owls would be treated with a
mind-altering drug. In fact, in the 1960s the common response was
tranquilizers. I had a lot of people suggest I put him on tranquilizers.
I have seen Ritalin control those impulses to jump from one subject to
another in young boys I taught in Church and it’s so sad. The LaFever
study will “prompt other communities to study their rates of Ritalin use
in school-aged children” Xavier Castellanos of the National Institute of
Mental Health observed. “Were the previous estimates of ADHD too low? Is
ADHD being overdiagnosed or are doctors now doing a better job of
diagnosing it? Certainly no one has found the prevalence of Ritalin use
to be this high up until now.”
Before allowing your child to take a mind-altering drug, first ask
yourself how many hours a day of active play is he participating in.
Does he have the opportunity to run, jump, and play vigorously a couple
of hours a day? Would his energy level be a problem if you were living
in a log cabin and he was up milking a cow at 5 AM? If the you have to
say “no” to these questions, HE’S not the one with the problem. You and
the teacher are the problem. He needs to be given more challenges and
more physical activity. It’s quite possible he is a smart kid and is
simply totally bored.
I bought a trampoline for Guy and when he couldn’t sit still or was
driving his sisters crazy I’d say, “Guy, go jump on the trampoline for
15 minutes.” He’d jump for longer than that and come in happy. Still, to
the day of his graduation he hated high school and would avoid going
whenever possible. The school kept trying to get Guy to act “normal.” He
never did. He couldn’t slow down that much. After high school he worked
for a year at a quarry breaking up rocks with a jackhammer, saved his
money and went to Japan on a mission for his Church, came home and spent
the next 15 years either in a classroom or in the army.
Had I given him Ritalin in elementary school to “slow him down” or
make him more content with meaningless paperwork, he would never have
made it as an orthopedic surgeon. However, he’s the kind of doctor
everyone wants in the emergency room - alert, quick thinking, well
prepared and energetic. Without a doubt had he been on Ritalin then, or
now, he wouldn’t have those characteristics. Of course, all the ADHD
symptoms didn’t go away. To this day the government’s mountains of
paperwork bores him just like the English teacher’s boring lessons.
However, today if he wanted to he could hire one of his old English
teachers to do all that stuff at close to minimum wage while he saves
the lives of people broken and bleeding to death after a car accident.
To comment: mmostert@originalsources.com
PLEASE SUPPORT REAGAN.COM!
HotTopics Online
Preprocessor
Copyright © 1996-1999 Waveshift, Inc.