Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
|
In the ’90s, most parents look to psychology
for answers, but psychology doesn’t have one set; it has two — pre-’60s
answers and post-’60s answers — and they conflict .
Every sensate American knows the post-’60s answers. Turn
on the tube and you hear them from all the talking heads. Not just
establishment experts, but mainstream teachers, preachers, politicians and
journalists, too. All subscribe to the conventional wisdom of the ’90s:
All kids who kill are in great distress; they’ve been neglected, rejected
and abused; their self-esteem is low; they are crying out for help. They
need more love and understanding, more communication and parental
attention, more early intervention, professional counseling and anger
management training. And the reason we have more of these kids today is
because we have more absent parents, more media violance, more guns.
Will the Colorado killers fit this profile? Were they the
abused offspring of harsh, uncaring parents and a cold, indifferent
community, with nowhere to turn for help?
So far it doesn’t look like it. Eric Harris and Dylan
Klebold both came from intact middle-class families variously described by
neighbors as “solid,” “sensitive” and “utterly normal.” Both had already
been through the therapeutic mill. Each boy had received individual
counseling; Harris got anger management training as well. Both finished
their therapy in February, two months before the crime, and both received
glowing reports from their counselors.
Maybe, when all the facts are known, they will turn out to
be a lot more like Kip Kinkel, the 15-year-old Oregon shooter who vanished
from the news as soon as his disquieting life story began to emerge,
because it didn’t fit the profile. Kinkel was a problem for this approach
because he had it all, everything ’90s experts recommend. His parents were
popular teachers, one of them was always there for him when he came home
from school, and both did their best to make him happy, spending time with
him, taking him on family vacations, helping him get whatever he wanted,
even when the things he wanted unnerved them. The parents made few
demands, rejected firm discipline as too harsh and sought professional
help, early and often. They were in counseling, along with Kip, when he
shot them both dead, killed two of his many school friends and wounded 18
others.
Looking at cases like this, psychologists in the 1950s and
earlier had a set of answers you don’t hear much any more. Here’s an
updated sample: We have more wanton school boy killers today because we
have more narcissists, and the step from being a narcissist to a wanton
killer is a short one, especially in adolescence.
A narcissist is a person who never progressed beyond the
self-love of infancy, one who learned superficial social skills —
narcissists are often charming — but never learned to truly love another
and, through love, to view others as separate persons with a worth and
value equal to their own. To the narcissist, other people have no
intrinsic worth; their value is purely instrumental. They are useful when
they satisfy his desires and enhance his self-esteem; they are as
disposable as bottle caps when they don’t.
Only the narcissist matters, and because his sense of
self-importance is so grossly inflated, his feelings are easily hurt. When
others thwart him or fail to give him the excessive, unearned respect he
demands, he reacts with rage and seeks revenge, the more dramatic the
better.
Take guns away from kids like these, and many won’t settle
for knives and baseball bats; they’ll turn to deadlier weapons — to
explosives, as that overgrown school boy, Ted Kaczinski, did, or to
environmental poisons, as the young people of Aum Shunriki did. Kip was on
his way — police found five bombs at his house. And the Colorado killers
upped the ante; they made more than 30 bombs and used shrapnel as well as
bullets to blow away their victims.
Will more counseling and anger management classes help? At
best, they are palliatives in cases like these. They can put a patch over
the hole at the core of these kids, the moral void, but they cannot fill
the hole.
No brand of psychology can, and earlier brands of
psychology — Sigmund Freud’s especially — had the humility to recognize
that. He saw the hole for what it is, a moral hole that only moral
training can fill. Not just calm, rational, smiley-face, didactic lessons,
but the kind of intense, gut-level experiences children have when their
parents draw a sharp moral line and demonstrate a willingness to go all
out to defend it, making it clear to their kids early on that there are
limits to what can be accepted, actions so morally wrong that they cannot
and will not be tolerated.
Through experiences like these, normal children learn that
the unconditional parental love they could take for granted as infants and
toddlers can no longer be taken for granted. It is no longer
unconditional; it can be withdrawn. And to avoid that frightening outcome,
the child learns to see his parents as more than human pinatas, full of
goodies he has only to bang away at to get. He learns to see them as moral
beings with standards and values, making them his own and developing a
conscience in the process.
Many ’90s experts don’t understand this process. They
focus only on self-esteem, not on esteem for others. They ask only if the
child is loved, not whether the child has learned to love and respect
others, and they obsess about the methods parents use to teach their kids,
ignoring the content, the moral lessons they are trying to teach,
insisting that any physical punishment, however infrequently and
judiciously applied, is child abuse.
These experts have no real solutions to offer, when the
problem is overindulgence rather than abuse, as it so often is in the
’90s. They are part of the problem, and the sooner we recognize that, the
better off we will be.
Barbara Lerner is a psychologist and lawyer who runs a consulting
firm in Chicago. Write letters to The Detroit News, Editorial Page, 615 W.
Lafayette, Detroit, Mich. 48226, or fax us at (313) 222-6417, or send an
e-mail to letters@detnews.com |