Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
|
by MONA CHAREN
THEY DESERVE A CERTAIN ADMIRATION, these tireless liberals do,
for their ceaseless struggle to right wrongs --- even when the
wrongs are all in their heads.
Take equal pay. According to the AFL-CIO, Sen. Tom Daschle and
President Bill Clinton, unequal pay continues to beset American
women. Columnist Ellen Goodman argues that while women earned 59
cents on the dollar compared with men in 1969, they now earn 74
cents on the dollar compared with men.
President Clinton cites the same figure and hopes for passage of
legislation that would permit the Department of Labor to evaluate
jobs and tell employers what to pay each employee.
Echoing a thousand campaigns past, the National Committee on Pay
Equity (an arm of the AFL-CIO) has issued a handbook for activists
that recommends such ideas as "Hold a BBQ or community cookout with
food that is reduced in size to reflect the wage gap" or encourage
local restaurants to offer "discounts on selected items to highlight
the disparity in pay, such as: a drink special, with $0.74 drinks
for women and $1.00 drinks for men."
As usual, the zeal of these would-be reformers is inversely
proportional to their accuracy.
Ellen Goodman is quite wrong to imagine that little has changed
since 1969.
One thing that has changed is that the national debate now
profits from the contributions of non-feminist but scholarly women
who know how to evaluate data.
A pair of them, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, an economist with the
American Enterprise Institute, and Christine Stolba, a doctoral
candidate at Emory University, have published (with the help of the
Independent Women's Forum) a new edition of their book "Women's
Figures: An Illustrated Guide to the Economic Progress of Women in
America."
As everyday experience suggests, women have made dramatic
economic progress in the past 40 years. In nearly every field of
endeavor, from advanced degrees to business ownership, women have
made great strides. Women comprised only 12 percent of pharmacists
in 1970, compared with 44 percent today. They were only 27 percent
of public relations specialists, whereas they now dominate the field
with 66 percent. There are five times as many female lawyers today
as there were 30 years ago and nearly three times as many doctors.
The wage gap, Furchtgott-Roth and Stolba explain, is a crude
comparison of the wages of all men compared with the wages of all
women. It does not take into account education, training, time on
the job, or full or part-time work. In reality, the most important
factor in the wage gap between men and women is probably summed up
in one word: children. Women with children tend to take more time
off from work, accumulate less seniority and accordingly earn less
than men. And the more children a woman has, the more her income is
likely to suffer. The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth finds
that among workers ages 27 to 33 who have no children, women's
earnings are 98 percent of men's.
The president, the AFL-CIO and other organs of the establishment
tend to take it on faith that when men's and women's wages differ,
discrimination must be at work. They are familiar with the data
showing that mothers earn less than childless women but tend to see
this as yet further discrimination. Furchtgott-Roth and Stolba
respond with an economist's question: If firms can get away with
such discrimination, why do we not see employers taking advantage of
this by hiring only mothers and pocketing the profits?
This slim volume deserves an award for maximum number of myths
shattered per page. Do women enter the work force because they must
or because they choose? The latter, in most cases. Does a glass
ceiling keep women from the top echelon of business?
No, it takes decades to rack up the education and work experience
necessary to become a top CEO. As women move up the pipeline, they
are achieving top spots. Though feminists complain of a "pink
ghetto," it is men who hold the vast majority of the least desirable
and most dangerous jobs such as pest controller and timber cutter.
For every woman who is killed on the job, 13 men die.
The Labor Department should look into this. Comparable death,
anyone?
|
Dads Against the Divorce Industry