|
Don't Throw the Book At All Deadbeat DadsKathleen Parker
"You can't open a newspaper these days without reading
about America's couple du jour: Deadbeat Dad and Welfare Mom.
They're the bane of moral America, metaphor for our nation's
declining families, political scapegoats for everything from the
national deficit to teen violence.
The solution to our problems is crystal clear, to hear our
leaders talk. Track down the deadbeats, make them pay up, and some
800,000 welfare moms and children magically will be freed from the
shackles of poverty and dependency. President Clinton has promised
as much along with his vow to track down fathers who've fallen
behind in their child-support payments. Meanwhile, state attorney
generals around the country are posting "wanted" fliers of deadbeat
dads on courthouse walls and on the Internet, as well as garnishing
wages, throwing fathers in jail and, in some cases, revoking
driver's licenses.
Who are these dastardly deadbeats anyway? They're probably
lolling around some Caribbean beach as we speak, sipping frozen
daiquiris from pineapple shells while bikini-clad native girls
massage their feet. Such is the stereotypical image that comes to
mind as we ponder the irascible deadbeat dad - a man who has
abandoned his family to pursue broader interests.
We need only recall Jeffrey Nichols - the $300,000-a-year
precious metals expert who didn't support his kids - to feel smugly
self-righteous in our pursuit of these scoundrels. The problem is,
most deadbeats aren't like Nichols. Most are more like William
Koontz, a Clarence, MO factory worker who earns $15,000 a year and
owes $96,000 in back child support. Koontz's wages now are being
garnished to the tune of $140 per week to reimburse the state of
Florida for money it paid Koontz's ex-wife to support their two
children. His new family, meanwhile, is on food stamps.
Those weary of government handouts are pleased to applaud
government action that exacts greater responsibility from parents.
Yet, there's the nagging sense that not all financially strapped
dads are malicious or neglectful, and that these symbolic public
lynchings in some cases may be unfair.
Gerald Rowles, head of DA*DI (Dads Against The Divorce Industry),
analyzed Iowa's recently unveiled deadbeat dad poster comprised of
men who habitually had disregarded court orders. Nine of the 11 are
twentysomething, blue-collar construction or low-income workers
earning annual salaries of about $16,000.
"My suspicion," says Rowles, "is that most of these guys don't
even know that a court-order has been issued." Meanwhile, all have
been found guilty in the public eye if not by a court with no
consideration of possible extenuating circumstances.
No one's trying to raise the status of deadbeat dad to martyr,
but the current political fervor radiates the indiscriminate heat of
a lynch mob. The truth is that the vast majority of non-custodial
fathers DO pay child support. Many who don't pay simply don't have
the money. The federal government says 66 percent of non-payments
are due to "financial inability."
In other cases, fathers don't pay because they've been alienated
from their children, often not by choice. According to the Census
Bureau 90 percent of fathers awarded joint custody pay their child
support. Of those with visitation rights, 79 percent pay. Of those
fathers with no visitation, only 45 percent meet their child-support
obligations.
In other words, men who don't get to see their children tend to
move on, a fact that may not be morally defensible, but which
nonetheless is humanly understandable.
It seems that if we're really interested in protecting children
rather than in seeking revenge or increasing political leverage, we
might do better to stop slapping fathers' faces on wanted posters
and focus on the underlying problem, which seems obvious:
For a variety of reasons, fathers increasingly feel
disenfranchised from their children. It is nearly axiomatic that
with disenfranchisement comes dereliction of duty. The solution to
deadbeat dads isn't criminalizing fathers, but allowing them to be
part of their children's lives. Tonight, in a nation where
fatherlessness is recognized as one of our most serious social
problems, 42 percent of all children will sleep in a house where
their biological father does NOT live.
The wonder isn't that we have deadbeat dads, but that we don't
have more.
Sure, some of the deadbeats are low-lifes who don't care about
their kids. In every town and country, a certain percentage of men
and women are irredeemable scumbags. But it's surely unfair and
unproductive to label every father who falls behind in his child
support payments a "deadbeat dad." It's also not a very nice message
to send to his children, who, you can be certain, already have
suffered enough."
Kathleen Parker's column is distributed by Tribune
Media Services. She welcomes your views and suggestions. Mail: The
Orlando Sentinel, MP-6, P.O. Box 2833, Orlando, FL 32803-2833.
Back to Dad's
Page

Dads Against the Divorce Industry
|