Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
Strong Medicine
for Weak Parenting
This is a
WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
Saturday, November 15, 2003
By
Samuel Blumenfeld
A bill (HR 1170) to prevent schools from forcing parents to drug
their kids diagnosed as having Attention Deficit Disorder was passed
by the U.S. House of Representatives on May 21 by a vote of 425 to
1. The legislation, the "Child Medication Safety Act of 2003" (SB
1390) was introduced in the Senate by Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev.,
where it is being kept in cold storage.
The House passed the bill overwhelmingly – and with good reason.
The forced drugging of American schoolchildren has become pandemic,
and it is time to put a stop to this psychiatric abuse of American
children.
But something happened to this bill on the way to the Senate. The
pharmaceutical and mental-health lobby got to the senators on the
Health, Education, Labor and Pension (H.E.L.P.) Committee before the
bill arrived. Democrat members of that committee include such
liberal heavyweights as Ted Kennedy, Christopher Dodd, Conn., Tom
Harkin, Iowa, Barbara Mikulski, Md., Jim Jeffords, Vt., John
Edwards, N.C., and Hillary Clinton, N.Y. Concerned parents contacted
Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd to get their support. So far, the reply
has been negative. Yet, all of these senators are the most
vociferous supporters of public education.
On Nov. 4, the Subcommittee on Substance Abuse held a hearing to
which no parents supporting the bill were invited. The one parent
who did attend was one acceptable to the mental-health lobby. That
subcommittee is chaired by Sen. Mike DeWine, Republican from Ohio.
The ranking member is Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts.
There are between 4 and 6 million schoolchildren now taking
psychotropic drugs daily so that they can attend school. There must
be something wrong with an education system that requires so many
children to be drugged just to attend school.
Last year, I spent a week in Beijing, China. During that week, I
visited a school where I was able to observe about 500 children
doing their morning physical exercises in the schoolyard. I asked my
host how many of these children were on Ritalin. He asked me what
Ritalin was. He had never heard of it. In short, in China they don't
have ADD, and they don't drug schoolchildren.
Are American children more mentally handicapped than Chinese
children? Are they afflicted with a mental disease that is more
prevalent in the United States than anywhere else on the globe?
Many parents, against their better judgment, have been forced by
the schools to put their children on medication because teachers are
finding it more and more difficult to handle their frustrated, angry
pupils.
But why do these youngsters become behavioral problems? In many
cases it's because of how they were being taught to read. As an
expert on the teaching of reading, I can attest that these children
are the victims of the whole-language method that creates so much
learning frustration that many children become disruptive and
violent. For the school, drugs, not more effective teaching methods,
are the only solution.
American children should not be required to ingest cocaine-like
stimulants in order to let the teachers off the hook. Parents should
not be forced to drug their children to satisfy the school's
dysfunctional curriculum.
There was no ADD or Ritalin when I was going to school in the
1930s and '40s. And that's because you simply could not have an
attention deficit disorder in the kind of classrooms that existed
then: clean, quiet and orderly. We sat in desks bolted to the floor,
and the teacher was the focus of our attention. She taught everyone
the same thing, using time-tested teaching methods that were
rational and effective. There were no distractions. The walls were
bare except for a picture of George Washington.
But let's fast-forward to the classrooms of today. Not clean,
quiet and orderly, but chaotic, messy and disorderly. Now children
are seated around tables, pestering one another, socializing,
coughing in each other's faces. The walls are plastered with every
kind of visual distraction – from Mickey Mouse to dinosaurs. The
teacher is no longer the focus of attention. She's a facilitator
wandering around the room, using the most irrational methods of
teaching. These classrooms are incubators of ADD.
Since it is unlikely that this chaotic classroom configuration
will be changed by the educators or legislators, we can expect more
ADD and ADHD in the future. But one thing can be done: The Congress
can restore to parents their rights to govern their own children's
education and medication. Powerful psychotropic drugs have no place
in sane, rational education.
Phone your senator and get them moving on this bill.
Dr. Samuel L.
Blumenfeld is the author of eight books on education, including:
"Is Public Education Necessary?" "NEA: Trojan Horse in American
Education," "The Whole Language/OBE Fraud" and "Homeschooling: A
Parents Guide to Teaching Children." His books are available on Amazon.com. Back issues of his
incisive newsletter, The Blumenfeld Education Letter, are available
online.
To view this item online, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35623
Should the government force drugs
on kids?
Posted: November 15, 2003
1:00 a.m.
Eastern
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Back to DA*DI's
Home
Dads Against the Divorce Industry