Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
|
by Dr. Laura Schlessinger
IN THE AFTERMATH of the Littleton, Colo., school massacre, we are
subjected to the psychobabble and hand-wringing designed to
alleviate our fears. As human beings, mortal and ultimately frail,
we survive on delusion.
One such delusion is that some psychologist's checklist of
so-called "warning signals" can assure us that we can predict what
is ultimately unpredictable. In New Jersey and New York, such
profiling for drug dealers, gang members and other criminals is
under attack for "stereotyping."
Another such delusion is some psychologist's notion of THE cause
for a teen-ager's murderous activity, which when known, will give us
the power to control what is ultimately uncontrollable. The
activists protesting media violence, free access to firearms, and
the ban on prayer in the schools have taken the opportunity to
promote their causes, while naysayers argue that not one of these
issues is THE reason children become violent.
Both the activists and the naysayers are correct. It is not one
of these problems that is the culprit; it is all of them in unison
and more. To loosely paraphrase Peggy Noonan's Wall Street Journal
op-ed piece of April 23, children are like fish in the water -- when
the water is polluted, the fish become sick.
However, only some of those fish die. The question is why aren't
more of the fish dying? Well, if we look only at murderous rampages,
it would seem that most of the fish are OK. However, if we look at
cynicism, nihilism, cheating, vulgarity, negativity, low character,
drug use, promiscuity and other behaviors and attitudes, it would
appear that many of the fish are the living dead.
As contradictory as it is to our desire to believe that people
are inherently good unless some force makes them different (note the
rationale that the teen gunmen perpetrated their horror because they
were "picked on"), the truth is that some people simply choose evil.
And the more that people, especially impressionable children, are
surrounded by evil, the more influenced, tempted, seduced and
intrigued by evil they become. In other words, the more familiar
evil becomes, the more it seems a legitimate outlet.
It is unarguable that evil has tremendous power, and from that
power comes the allure. Evil delivers immediate gratification. Evil
provides a sense of power, dominance, importance, control and
security. Evil is a strong identity.
And in this imperfect world, evil often not only wins, but is
also defended, protected and venerated.
The day after the massacre, one of my radio listeners faxed me a
newspaper report from Pennsylvania. It seems that one of those kids
who fits the profile as "dangerous" was thrown out of school. He had
put horrible pictures on an Internet site (our modern cesspool of
uncontrolled ids), morphing his math teacher with Hitler and
soliciting a hit man to take out the principal, among other
threatening and ugly words. Believe it or not, the parents are suing
over his dismissal. The suit includes such outrageous, blasphemous
First Amendment claims as that the dismissal over Internet images
infringes on his right to speech. Ironically, he is reported
to now be in a private school in Colorado.
Note that it is the boy's parents, those foremost responsible for
their children, who are defending evil, and in doing so, endangering
our children.
In The New York Times on April 25, the Littleton sheriff had
these words to say about responsibility. Noting that detectives had
found a shotgun barrel on one of the teen-ager's bedroom dressers,
bomb-making materials and weapons in their houses, and a diary
detailing a year's preparation for the apocalypse, he said: "A lot
of this stuff was clearly visible, and the parents should have
known. I think parents are accountable for their kids' activities."
One can listen to shrinks such as Dr. Donald Cohen, director of
Yale University's Child Studies Center, who says, "You can blame a
parent only until you've become a parent." This is true only up to a
point. Astonishingly, I have gotten a dozen letters from parents,
alarmed and directionless, who fear that, in spite of their loving
guidance, they have demons for children, and believe their children
will likely become violent. They are probably right.
According to these parents, they get very little help from the
criminal justice system that delivers slaps on the wrists ("he's but
a child"), nor from once-a-week therapy sessions ("he needs love and
understanding"). According to criminal behavior expert Dr. Stanton
Samenow, these children need serious consequences (prison), serious
supervision (special, expensive lock-down schools), and specialized
attitude, thought and behavior modification treatment.
Our society, instead, gives these "demons" easy access to guns
and Internet instructions for designing weapons of mass destruction.
It inundates our children with images of violence and depravity,
rewards immorality as long as the person is "doing a good job," and
mocks godliness.
Small wonder that our fish are dying.
DA*DI add note: We would add to the cultural influences;
Fatherlessness, a readiness to administer drugs to "troublesome"
children, and the politically correct prohibitions on parental
control - such as spanking. |
Dads Against the Divorce Industry