Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
|
by Cathy Young
The contentious debate over corporal punishment of children - a
part of the "culture wars" between conservatives who support
parental authority and liberals inclined to be suspicious of it -
has recently focused on Michigan, with two cases of mothers accused
of assault for slapping their wayward teen-age daughters. A month
ago, 32-year-old Kathi Herren of Novi was convicted and sentenced to
probation and counseling. Last week, 47-year-old Deborah Skousen of
Genoa had better luck: A jury took just more than an hour to clear
her.
Both women have presented their prosecution as a
misguided intrusion by the state into parental discipline. They have
many supporters. Indeed, in many ways, the two stories could be seen
as perfect cases for champions of parental rights.
Herren's 14-year-old daughter, Amber Russell, had
been behaving defiantly, drinking alcohol and stealing cigarettes.
The day of the incident that led to the charges, Amber had left home
despite being grounded; coming back, she yelled profanities at her
mother and stepfather, then went up to her room and turned up the
stereo. It was then that the confrontation took place. The police
were called by a neighbor in whose house Amber had sought refuge.
Eighteen-year-old Rebecca Skousen, too, had been
breaking rules, drinking and lying. The slap came after she
disappeared from home for the weekend, then refused to say where she
had been. Deborah Skousen testified that Rebecca called her vulgar
names (Rebecca made the same charge against her mother). The next
day, the girl complained to her high school counselors, who sent her
to the emergency room - even though it's in dispute whether she
suffered even a slight bruise - and called the cops.
Skousen was charged with aggravated domestic
violence (what, then, would simple domestic violence be?). If
convicted, she could have received a year in jail and a $1,000 fine.
Even many parents, and experts, who oppose physical
discipline say the authorities have gone too far. Parents, they say,
are trapped between the rock of abuse laws and the hard place of
increasingly popular statutes making parents responsible for their
teen-age kids' misconduct. Consider another Michigan case. In 1996,
Anthony and Susan Provenzino of St. Clair Shores were convicted for
failing to control their 17-year-old son, who was accused of several
burglaries and drug possession (a judge later threw out their
convictions).
It's very well to say parents can discipline without
resorting to physical force. But reasoning doesn't always work, and
sometimes the parents do need to remind the kids who's the boss -
however offensive that may sound to proponents of warm and fuzzy
egalitarianism.
And yet these cases aren't as simple as
parental-rights hawks might think. Herren is an alcoholic and was
intoxicated when she hit her daughter (she also smashed a lamp and
threw a stereo on the floor); she was convicted by jurors who had
all swatted their own kids, and the judge concluded that her actions
were more like a drunken brawl than parental discipline.
There were no such obvious problems in the Skousen
case, which probably explains the different outcome. Nevertheless,
it seems likely that Deborah Skousen has a nasty temper. According
to press reports, the father, Samuel Skousen, seemed fearful of his
wife when he testified; after slapping Rebecca, Deborah Skousen gave
him "a shove" for being too lenient with the girl. (What do
feminists who dismiss female aggression in the home as a misogynist
fantasy make of all this?)
Perhaps Skousen could have benefited from
counseling, which the prosecutors had wanted her to accept in
exchange for dropping the charges - and which Rebecca claims was her
only goal. But surely, Rebecca needed counseling at least as much.
The problem is that when the state intervenes in the
family, it runs roughshod over complex dynamics, slapping the
"victim" label on one person and the "perpetrator" label on another.
This approach doesn't always fit domestic violence cases involving
adults. Where parents and children are concerned, it's a disaster.
Cathy Young is vice-president of the Women's Freedom Network.
Her column is published on Wednesday. Write any responses to The
Detroit News, Editorial Page, 615 W. Lafayette Blvd., Detroit, Mich.
48226 or fax to (313) 222-6417 or send an e-mail message to mailto:letters@detnews.com(Young's
e-mail address is mailto:71774.1305@compuserve.com
|