Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
|
by Cathy Young
If there was a single most memorable moment on my visit last
month to Michigan, it had to be when I was called a house servant of
the ruling class.
I was at the University of Michigan Law School in
Ann Arbor for a debate on domestic violence co-sponsored by the
Federalist Society and the Women Law Students’ Association. My
argument was that while the feminist movement deserves credit for
getting police and the courts to take domestic abuse seriously, it
has also perpetuated a one-sided, extreme view of family violence as
a male “war against women.” As a result, too often, trivial quarrels
are blown out of proportion, men are presumed guilty (particularly
when it comes to personal protection orders) and women are presumed
to be victims, sometimes even when they say otherwise.
My opponent was Andrea Lyon, a clinical assistant
professor of law at the U-M and a practicing attorney — which she
repeatedly stressed. Apart from this “I know what I’m talking about
and you don’t” subtext, the gist of Lyon’s argument was that there
may well be egregious abuses and violations of defendants’ rights in
domestic violence cases, but the same happens everywhere in the
legal system. (Which, even if true, hardly makes it right.)
Ironically, one example she cited — the child abuse
witch-hunts of the 1980s — reflected the same dogma as the excesses
of the war on domestic violence: If you disbelieve a claim of
victimization, you’re reabusing the victim.
Lyon also pooh-poohed any talk of feminist
excesses. Yes, she declared, every movement has its crazies, but of
course serious feminists don’t hate or demonize men. That was a
funny thing to say at a law school where Catharine MacKinnon, who
argues normal sex in our culture barely differs from rape, is an
esteemed professor.
It was also an ironic comment to make in view of
her own recent article in the Michigan Journal of Gender and the Law
— suggesting, for instance, that if the record of a domestic
incident shows that only the woman used violence, it may be because
she is willing to admit it, but the man lies. Does Lyon believe, I
asked, that women are inherently more honest?
In fact, the students — women and men alike —
generally accepted Lyon’s basic premise: Women in our society are so
oppressed that the law cannot treat them the same as men but must
tilt toward them to redress the imbalance. They took it for granted
that women virtually always have less power than their male partners
and can’t be expected to leave abusive marriages because they are
forced into economic dependency. Never mind that women end marriages
all the time for far less serious reasons, or that many women left
abusive husbands in days when they had far fewer job opportunities
than today.
And that acceptance struck me as sad. These young
women attending one of the most prestigious law schools in the
country are utterly convinced that they are under the thumb of a
brutal patriarchy. These young men who might be hard pressed to name
one “male privilege” they enjoy eagerly agree that their gender
should be viewed as a suspect class to undo that patriarchal
dominance. These potential future lawyers and judges insist that
equal protection under the law is not enough and different groups
must be treated differently because of the historical context of
oppression.
Clearly, those of us who believe in equal treatment
regardless of sex (or race) still have an uphill battle to fight.
But after the event at the law school was over, I thought of a good
reply to those who argue historical context matters more than the
individual. For several years, we have had before us a stark example
of what happens when people are obsessed with what one group did to
another 300 years ago. It is called Yugoslavia.
Cathy Young is co-founder and vice-president of the Women’s
Freedom Network. Her column is published on Wednesday. Write letters
to The Detroit News, Editorial Page, 615 W. Lafayette, Detroit,
Mich. 48226 or fax to (313) 222-6417 or send an e-mail message to
letters@detnews.com (Young’s e-mail address is
CathyYoung1@compuserve.com) |
Dads Against the Divorce Industry