Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
|
by Cathy Young
It would be superfluous to say the slaying of
Melanie Edwards, 33, and her 2-year-old daughter Carli in Seattle,
apparently by Edwards' estranged husband and Carli's father, Carlton
Lee Edwards, is terrible. The tragedy will be compounded, however,
if the public response causes more divorced and separated fathers to
be ripped out of their children's lives.
Melanie Edwards, who said her husband had repeatedly
assaulted her and threatened her life, had obtained a protective
order that forbade him to contact her or even to know where she
lived. However, Carlton Lee Edwards (who presented a number of
letters in his support) could still see his daughter.
The mother would drop off the child at a visitation
center where the father would arrive 15 minutes later to pick her
up; the same procedure was followed when the girl was returned to
her mother. Except that, last week, the father didn't leave after
dropping off Carli. He stayed around and fatally shot his wife and
daughter.
Predictably, and understandably, domestic violence
activists have pointed to these deaths as evidence that the courts
are too willing - in the words of June Wiley, program manager at the
Seattle agency New Beginnings - to "give Dad another chance." Neil
Jacobson, a psychologist at the University of Washington who studies
batterers, says visitation should not be allowed if a protective
order is filed against the father, because "that puts the woman at
risk."
It's easy to say, with the benefit of 20/20
hindsight, that Edwards shouldn't have been anywhere near his wife
or child. But an order of protection represents a mere
allegation of abuse; it is almost automatically issued to any
woman who requests one. (Men may encounter somewhat more
skepticism.)
The claim that some women make phony charges of
abuse as a divorce strategy may seem misogynist, though it is no
more a slur on all women than the fact that some men assault their
wives is a slur on all men. It's not just men's groups that decry
such misuse of protective orders; it's women like Elaine Epstein,
past president of the Massachusetts Bar Association, or Dorothy
Wright, a New Jersey lawyer and former board member of a battered
women's shelter who estimates that about half of divorce-related
domestic violence allegations are false. Similar concerns have been
voiced by attorneys and judges of both sexes in other states.
What's more, in many cases, protective orders are
not even based on accusations of violence, only on vague claims of
"fear" and of verbal abuse (not rising to the level of threats) by
the defendant. A one-year review in a Missouri court found that only
14 percent of petitions for such orders contained charges that
warranted prosecution for assault.
Fathers on the receiving end of orders of protection
can find themselves in a nightmare as bad as that of truly abused
women. Particularly in jurisdictions that emphasize tough domestic
violence policies, they can be arrested for returning a child's
phone call or sending a birthday card. Too often, they face a
virtual presumption of guilt - which is just as Wiley, Jacobson and
others would have it.
How can the legitimate interests of fathers and
children be reconciled with the need to prevent deaths like those of
Melanie and Carli Edwards?
For one, if the courts looked at the evidence
instead of rubber-stamping protective orders, they might have a
better chance of separating cases of real danger from false or
trivial charges.
But unfortunately, some tragedies cannot be
predicted or prevented. Generally, a police state is not considered
a proper price to pay for safety. (You can't be thrown out of your
home on a neighbor's complaint of harassment, even though a quarrel
between neighbors may escalate to murder, too.)
Let us not make an exception for fathers. Being
arbitrarily deprived of contact with one's children is an experience
that could push some nonviolent men over the edge.
Cathy Young is vice-president of the Women's Freedom Network.
Her column is normally published on Wednesday. Write letters to The
Detroit News, Editorial Page, 615 W. Lafayette, Detroit, Mich. 48226
or fax to (313) 222-6417 or send an e-mail message to
letters@detnews.com (Young's e-mail address is |
Dads Against the Divorce Industry