Dads Against the Divorce IndustryDA*DI is devoted to reinstating the societal valuation of Marriage and the traditional, nuclear American Family, with particular emphasis on the essential role of FATHERS. DA*DI offers contemporary reports and commentary on culture; its aberrations and its heroes. |
|
by Cathy Young
"Spanking May Promote Delinquency." "Study Links Spanking to
Kids' Antisocial Behavior." "Experts Say Spanking Deserves Bad Rap."
The headlines earlier this month seemed to confirm
the politically correct wisdom. A new study about family violence by
researcher Murray Straus, endorsed by the American Medical
Association, reportedly showed that children who are spanked for bad
behavior exhibit more such behavior later on.
Opponents of corporal punishment will, no doubt,
cite this research for years - without mentioning its limitations.
Straus' work on domestic violence is a model of good scholarship.
This time, though, his team didn't do the survey, but analyzed
findings from phone interviews conducted two years apart by the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Information on the kids came solely from
mothers - and the ones who spanked reported more mischief two years
later. But perhaps these moms were more likely to notice negative
things about their children.
Moreover, the kids were 6 to 9 years old, an age
when many pro-spanking experts feel corporal punishment is no longer
appropriate. An even more serious issue is the age of the moms. The
survey was limited to women 21 or younger. That means some of them
gave birth at 12. Is that a sample from which we can generalize to
the entire population?
Other research does not support Straus' warnings
about "violent child-rearing." Of 11 studies analyzed last year in a
report by the American Academy of Pediatrics, only one found
spanking had a harmful effect on children; six showed positive
results and four concluded it made no difference.
Besides, look around. The use of spanking has
declined considerably in the past 30 years. To say there has been no
corresponding drop in antisocial behavior among youngsters would be
quite an understatement.
Studies or no studies, the debate about sparing the
rod is conducted on an emotional level. Supporters of physical
discipline often invoke the Bible. Opponents say spanking teaches
children that "violence is OK" and that you can use your size and
strength to assert your power over someone.
I have no children and thus no personal stake in the
matter. My experience puts me in the I-was-spanked-and-turned-out-OK
camp, though I'm always appalled when I see a parent smack a kid in
public with a nastiness bordering on malevolence. Overly frequent
spanking probably can cause harm. But some psychologists say parents
who don't use physical discipline in a restrained, constructive
manner are more likely to lose their temper and inflict real abuse.
Besides, I'm irritated by the silliness of common
anti-spanking arguments. Such as, "How come it's illegal to hit
anyone else but legal to hit your own kid?" The parent-child
relationship is unique in ways far more dramatic than that. You are
not legally responsible for anyone else's physical safety or
economic support. There is no other person who cannot leave your
house without your permission. You might as well ask why forcing any
other person into your car and taking him somewhere he doesn't want
to go would be a crime, but not with your child.
Or take the cliche that spanking teaches that
violence is an appropriate method for solving problems. In fact, any
punishment - physical or not - has a coercive element that isn't a
good model for normal interaction. If you take a child's toys away,
will she conclude that grabbing others' belongings is the way to
settle disputes? If you make him take a "time-out" in his room, will
he learn that whenever someone annoys him he can lock that person
up?
To most anti-spanking partisans, it seems, the
important thing is for children to "feel good about themselves."
They inhabit a world where the lion lies down with the lamb, and a
parent can reason with a 2-year-old. Between these two, my bet is on
the lion.
Cathy Young is vice-president of the Women's Freedom Network.
You may write her at The News, Editorial Page, 615 W. Lafayette
Blvd., Detroit, Mich. 48226.
|
Dads Against the Divorce Industry